DUTY OF CANDOUR

Outline

Scope

Policy Statement

The Policy

Compassion, Humanity and Candour

Next of Kin (NOK)

Related Policies

Related Guidance

Training Statement

Appendix 1

Policy Statement

This is a requirement under the Fundamental Standards Regulation 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Put simply, candour means the quality of being open and honest. Candour can only work when it is part of a wider commitment to safety, listening, and learning, with an organisational commitment to continual improvement. Care and treatment are not risk free and evidence heard at the 2014 Dalton Review confirmed what was already known.

When things go wrong in health or social care settings, service users and families want to know three things:

To be told honestly what happened.

What can be done to deal with any harm caused?

To know what will be done to prevent a recurrence to someone else.

The duty of candour applies to all health and social care providers registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

The duty applies to all cases of ‘significant harm’. This composite classification would cover the requirements of the reporting duty for NHS and social care providers currently in place with the CQC. These are:

National Reporting and Learning System (NHS).

Statutory notifications (social care).

in social care, this is the ‘harm threshold’, which is breached when a statutory notification is required to the CQC.

The Policy

Compassion, Humanity and Candour

The obligations and challenges of candour serve to remind us that, for all its technological and forensic advances, health and social care is still a deeply human activity. Systems and processes are necessary to support good compassionate care, but they can never serve as its substitute. Achieving candour is about engaging hearts and minds and creating a culture that nurtures it. Important as it may be, a compliance-focused approach is not the best way to begin the journey. Organisations need to start from the simple recognition that candour is the right thing to do. The commitment to candour has to be about values, rooted in the genuine engagement of staff, building on their professional duties and personal commitment to service users. It is right to be clear about thresholds and enforcement, but nothing will be gained if we lose sight of the fundamental purpose of candour, which is to do the right thing for all users of health and social care services. Hence, the government’s choice of a statutory duty sends an unequivocal signal to the health and social care sector that this matters.

Moderate harm means harm that requires a moderate increase in treatment and significant but not permanent harm. A moderate increase in treatment means an unplanned return to surgery, unplanned readmission, prolonged episode of care, extra time in hospital or as an outpatient, cancelling of treatment care transfer to another treatment area (such as intensive care).

A notifiable safety incident is any unintended or unexpected incident that occurred in respect of a Service user during the provision of a regulated activity that, in the reasonable opinion of a health care professional, could result in or appears to have resulted in:

The death of the service user, where the death relates directly to the incident, rather than to the natural course of the service user’s illness or underlying condition, or

Severe harm, moderate harm, or prolonged psychological harm to the service user:

‘Prolonged psychological harm’ means psychological harm that a service user has experienced or is likely to experience for a continuous period of at least 28 days.

‘Severe harm’ means a permanent lessening of bodily, sensory, motor, physiologic or intellectual functions, including removal of the wrong limb or brain damage, which is related directly to the incident and not related to the natural course of the resident’s illness or underlying condition.

The guidance set out below should be followed to fulfil our duty as a provider.

As soon as reasonably practicable:

Notify the relevant person that the incident has occurred.

 

Provide support to the relevant person, where appropriate, including when informing them of the incident.

The information should be given in person, when possible.

An account of the incident should be provided, which is factual and true at the date of the notification.

Advise them of the relevant steps or actions that are to be taken.

Include an apology.

Record the incident and the steps and actions taken.

The notification must be followed up in writing, confirming all of the above points.

If the relevant person declines to engage in the process, this should be recorded and include the attempts to engage with them.

In this regulation, relevant person means the service user or in the following circumstances, a person lawfully acting on their behalf (this would only be someone with a lasting power of attorney or a court appointed deputy):

On the death of the service user,

Where the service user is under 16 and not competent to make a decision concerning their care or treatment, or

Where the service user is 16 or over and lacks capacity in relation to the matter.

 

‘Apology’ means an expression of sorrow or regret in respect of a notifiable safety incident.

‘Notifiable’ means to an external regulator, e.g. CQC, Health and Safety Executive.

Next of Kin (NOK)

This term is commonly used and there is a presumption that the person identified has certain rights and duties.

Health and social care colleagues should always consult the people closest to a person who lacks the capacity to understand that person’s wishes and feelings to help them make a decision in that person’s best interest.

However, the person identified as NOK should not be asked to sign and/or consent to certain interventions, unless they have a legal basis for doing so, such as an enduring power of attorney (EPA) or the appropriate lasting power of attorney (LPA) for health and welfare. This is a mistake often made in many health and social care settings where family members are asked to sign care plans or end-of-life plans and other treatment options and provide consent that is not legally valid.

Related Policies

Accessible Information and Communication

Dignity and Respect

Good Governance and Quality

Notifications

Related Guidance

CQC Regulation 20: Duty of Candour:

https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/regulations-enforcement/regulation-20-duty-candour

NMC:

https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/guidance/the-professional-duty-of-candour/read-the-professional-duty-of-candour/

Training Statement

The management need to be fully aware of this legal duty and it will be incorporated into Induction and a separate briefing will be in place for all managers involved in good governance within their job role. All staff, during induction, are made aware of the organisation’s policies and procedures, all of which are used for training updates. All policies and procedures are reviewed and amended where necessary, and staff are made aware of any changes. Observations are undertaken to check skills and competencies. Various methods of training are used, including one to one, online, workbook, group meetings, and individual supervisions. External courses are sourced as required.

Date Reviewed: October 2022

Person responsible for updating this policy:

Next Review Date: October 2023

Return to Policy Heading (Ctrl+Click) – Policy Heading

Scroll to Top